When was the inkhorn controversy

You can subscribe to our writing tips, news and industry thoughts. No spam, just quality content, or your money back. Never mind. But you can unsubscribe anytime. A name is the biggest building block in the story you tell about your brand. So Meta — the revamped Facebook parent brand — is a name with a lot on its shiny, augmented reality shoulders.

And it can tell us something about the challenge posed by parent brands in general. Skip to content. The Inkhorn Controversy Posted on November 6, by areading. About areading Amity Reading is an assistant professor of English at Albion College, where she teaches early British literature specifically, medieval and Shakespeare.

Her research centers on Anglo-Saxon devotional poetry and homilies. March Oxford University Press. Perchance those well versed in the more complex lyricism amongst hip hop might challenge this summation. Click here to cancel reply. Research and Discovery. Thomas Elyot. The boke named the Gouernour. STC STC , fol. The objection to inkhorn terms was a largely irrational and emotive reaction by conservatives against the sudden increase in English vocabulary derived from classical sources which was taking place at this time.

Writers were experimenting with the language, importing and inventing terms to meet their needs, basing most of them on Latin, with some from Greek and other languages. Though many of their inventions and adaptations proved unsuccessful, large numbers of others which linguistic Canutes like Wilson objected to did gain a permanent place and are still in use today. Thomas Wilson illustrated his argument through an letter assumed invented from a Lincolnshire man to the Lord Chancellor which he felt contained many words which would be strange and obscure to the ordinary reader.

Why some new words survived while others languished or died out is a question nobody seems able to answer. Else why would commit and transmit become common, but the shorter demit be replaced by dismiss? Why did impede catch on but not expede? Why did emacerate lose out to emaciate but emancipate survive?